Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  123 / 144 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 123 / 144 Next Page
Page Background

123

RISE E RIDE

Dois estudos paralelos, multicêntricos, comparam ranibizumab (RBZ) 0.3 mg

ou 0.5 mg mensais

vs

Laser e injecção

sham

. No %nal do terceiro ano foi permi-

tido continuar tratamento em PRN com RBZ 0.5 mg

3

.

Fig. 2

Evidência de fase III demonstra e%cácia dos tratamentos anti-VEGF no EMD

1. Brown DM, et al. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:2013-22; 2. Nguyen QD, et al.

Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:789-801; 3.Morse, LS. 37th Macular Society meeting 2014; 4.

Mitchell P, et al. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:615 - 25; 5. Lang GE, et al. Ophthalmology.

2013; 120:2004 - 12; 6. Schmidt - Erfurth U, et al. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121:1045 - 53;

7.Elman MJ, et al. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:1064 - 77; 8. Elman MJ, et al. Ophthalmology.

2011; 118:609 - 14; 9.Elman MJ, et al. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:2312-8; 10. Prünte C.

AAO 2013; 11. Ohji M. ARVO 2012; 12. Sheidow T. ARVO 2013; 13. Korobelnik JF, et

al. Ophthalmology. 2014 epub ahead of print; 14

.http://investor.regeneron.com/releases

Fig. 3

Estudos comparativos directos anti-VEGF

vs

Laser

4