70 / 144
70
PERGUNTAS & RESPOSTAS
EMD
- Edema Macular Diabético
Accessed July 17, 2017.
6. Hermsen V. The use of ultrasound in the evaluation of diabetic vitreoretinopa-
thy. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1984;24(4):125-141.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub-med/6389408. Accessed July 17, 2017.
7. Hewick SA, Fairhead AC, Culy JC, Atta HR. A comparison of 10 MHz and 20 MHz
ultrasound probes in imaging the eye and orbit. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(4):551-555.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1772108&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed July 12, 2014.
8. Parchand S, Singh R, Bhalekar S. Reliability of Ocular Ultrasonography Findings
for Pre-surgical Evaluation in Various Vitreo-retinal Disorders. Semin Ophthalmol.
2014;29(4):236-241. doi:10.3109/08820538.2013.821506.
9. Han DP, Lewandowski M, Mieler WF. Echographic diagnosis of anterior hyaloidal %bro-
vascular proliferation. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill 1960). 1991;109(6):842-846.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1710443.Accessed July 17, 2017.
10. Fisher YL, Slakter JS, Friedman RA, Yannuzzi LA. Kinetic ultrasound evaluation of the
posterior vitreoretinal interface. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(7):1135-1138. http://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1891224. Accessed July 12, 2014.
11. Kicová N, Bertelmann T, Irle S, Sekundo W, Mennel S. Evaluation of a posterior vitreous
detachment: a comparison of biomicroscopy, B-scan ultrasonography and optical
coherence tomography to surgical %ndings with chromodissection. Acta Ophthalmol.
2012;90(4):e264-8. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02330.x.
12. Pinto F. Qual a importância da ecogra%a no estudo da interface vítreo-retiniana? In:
Quintão T, ed. A Interface Vítreo-Retiniana. Adesão Vitreo-Macular, Tracção Vítreo-
-Macular e Buraco Macular. %rst ed. Lisboa: GER. 2014:119-124.
13. Sebag J. Anomalous posterior vitreous detachment: a unifying concept in vitreo-reti-
nal disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242(8):690-698. doi:10.1007/
s00417-004-0980-1.
14. Restori M. Imaging the vitreous: optical coherence tomography and ultrasound ima-
ging. Eye (Lond). 2008;22(10):1251-1256. doi:10.1038/eye.2008.30.
15. Schwatz SD, Alexander R, Hiscott P, Gregor ZJ. Recognition of vitreoschisis in prolife-
rative diabetic retinopathy. A useful landmark in vitrectomy for diabetic traction retinal
detachment. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):323-328.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub-med/8594521. Accessed July 29, 2017.
16. Chu TG, Lopez PF, Cano MR, et al. Posterior vitreoschisis. An echographic %nding in
proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):315-322. http://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8594520. Accessed July 17, 2017.
17. Sebag J. Vitreoschisis in Diabetic Macular Edema. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci.
2011;52(11):8455. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8333.
18. Ossoinig KC. Echographic detection and classi%cation of posterior hyphemas. Ophthal-
mologica. 1984;189(1-2):2-11.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6472801.Acces-
sed July 17, 2017.
19. Kocabora MS, Gulkilik G, Yilmazli C, Taskapili M, Kocabora A. The predictive value
of echography in diabetic vitreous hemorrhage. Int Ophthalmol. 2005;26(6):215-219.
doi:10.1007/s10792-007-9043-z.